Identification_Information: Citation: Citation_Information: Originator: (creation): US Geological Survey Originator: (compilation): Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates Publication_Date: 20021100 Title: WATERSHEDS_HUC11__USGS_IN: Watersheds, 11-digit Hydrologic Units, in Indiana, (Derived from US Geological Survey, Polygon Shapefile) Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Vector digital data Publication_Information: Publication_Place: Evansville, IN Publisher: Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates Other_Citation_Details: This dataset is derived from the Digital Dataset of 14-digit hydrologic units in Indiana created by the US Geological Survey and Natural Resources Conservation Service; Dataset is one layer in the Indiana Statewide GIS Database funded by Indiana Department of Transportation. Online_Linkage: http://igs.indiana.edu/arcims/statewide/download.html Description: Abstract: WATERSHEDS_HUC11_USGS_IN is a polygon shapefile showing the boundaries of watersheds in Southwestern Indiana. Watersheds are noted by a 11-digit hydrologic unit. Actual hydrologic units often extend beyond the state and county boundaries. Purpose: Provide a large-scale digital database of 11-digit HU (watershed) boundaries for BROAD, GENERAL information for planning, development, and research in Indiana. Supplemental_Information: HUC11_WATERSHEDS_USGS_IN was created by dissolving the Digital Dataset of 14-digit hydrologic units in Indiana created by the US Geological Survey and Natural Resources Conservation Service; Time_Period_of_Content: Time_Period_Information: Range_of_Dates/Times: Beginning_Date: 1946 Ending_Date: 1991 Currentness_Reference: Publication date of source lineage Status: Progress: Complete Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned Spatial_Domain: Bounding_Coordinates: West_Bounding_Coordinate: -88.1607 East_Bounding_Coordinate: -84.6882 North_Bounding_Coordinate: 41.7753 South_Bounding_Coordinate: 37.7554 Keywords: Theme: Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: Geography Network Keyword Thesaurus Theme_Keyword: inlandWaters Theme: Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None Theme_Keyword: Hydrologic Unit Theme_Keyword: Hydrologic Unit Boundary Theme_Keyword: Hydrologic Unit Code Theme_Keyword: HUC Theme_Keyword: HU Theme_Keyword: HUA Theme_Keyword: 11-digit hydrologic unit Theme_Keyword: watershed Theme_Keyword: hydrology Place: Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None Place_Keyword: Indiana Place_Keyword: Adams County Place_Keyword: Allen County Place_Keyword: Bartholomew County Place_Keyword: Benton County Place_Keyword: Blackford County Place_Keyword: Boone County Place_Keyword: Brown County Place_Keyword: Carroll County Place_Keyword: Cass County Place_Keyword: Clark County Place_Keyword: Clay County Place_Keyword: Clinton County Place_Keyword: Crawford County Place_Keyword: Daviess County Place_Keyword: Dearborn County Place_Keyword: Decatur County Place_Keyword: DeKalb County Place_Keyword: Delaware County Place_Keyword: Dubois County Place_Keyword: Elkhart County Place_Keyword: Fayette County Place_Keyword: Floyd County Place_Keyword: Fountain County Place_Keyword: Franklin County Place_Keyword: Fulton County Place_Keyword: Gibson County Place_Keyword: Grant County Place_Keyword: Greene County Place_Keyword: Hamilton County Place_Keyword: Hancock County Place_Keyword: Harrison County Place_Keyword: Hendricks County Place_Keyword: Henry County Place_Keyword: Howard County Place_Keyword: Huntington County Place_Keyword: Jackson County Place_Keyword: Jasper County Place_Keyword: Jay County Place_Keyword: Jefferson County Place_Keyword: Jennings County Place_Keyword: Johnson County Place_Keyword: Knox County Place_Keyword: Kosciusko County Place_Keyword: Lagrange County Place_Keyword: Lake County Place_Keyword: LaPorte County Place_Keyword: Lawrence County Place_Keyword: Madison County Place_Keyword: Marion County Place_Keyword: Marshall County Place_Keyword: Martin County Place_Keyword: Miami County Place_Keyword: Monroe County Place_Keyword: Montgomery County Place_Keyword: Morgan County Place_Keyword: Newton County Place_Keyword: Noble County Place_Keyword: Ohio County Place_Keyword: Orange County Place_Keyword: Owen County Place_Keyword: Parke County Place_Keyword: Perry County Place_Keyword: Pike County Place_Keyword: Porter County Place_Keyword: Posey County Place_Keyword: Pulaski County Place_Keyword: Putnam County Place_Keyword: Randolph County Place_Keyword: Ripley County Place_Keyword: Rush County Place_Keyword: Scott County Place_Keyword: Shelby County Place_Keyword: Spencer County Place_Keyword: Starke County Place_Keyword: Steuben County Place_Keyword: St Joseph County Place_Keyword: Sullivan County Place_Keyword: Switzerland County Place_Keyword: Tippecanoe County Place_Keyword: Tipton County Place_Keyword: Union County Place_Keyword: Vanderburgh County Place_Keyword: Vermillion County Place_Keyword: Vigo County Place_Keyword: Wabash County Place_Keyword: Warren County Place_Keyword: Warrick County Place_Keyword: Washington County Place_Keyword: Wayne County Place_Keyword: Wells County Place_Keyword: White County Place_Keyword: Whitley County Access_Constraints: None Use_Constraints: USGS metadata states - The arcs that define each HU were digitized from hand-drawn drainage divides on 1:24,000-scale 7.5 minute topographic maps. Use of this geodataset at any scale larger than 1:24,000 is discouraged. DATA DISCLAIMER This data set was compiled by Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates, using data believed to be accurate; however, a degree of error is inherent in all data. This product is distributed "AS-IS" without warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to warranties of suitability of a particular purpose or use. No attempt has been made in either the designed format or production of these data to define the limits or jurisdiction of any federal, state, or local government. These data are intended for use only at the published scale or smaller and are for reference purposes only. They are not to be construed as a legal document or survey instrument. A detailed on-the-ground survey and historical analysis of a single site may differ from this data. CREDIT USGS metadata requests - "Acknowledgment of U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Indiana Department of Natural Resources-Division of Water would be appreciated in products derived from these data." Point_of_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates Contact_Person: Neal Schroeder Contact_Position: Geographer, Environmental Planner Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 6200 Vogel Road City: Evansville State_or_Province: IN Postal_Code: 47715-4006 Country: USA Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800-423-7411 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 812-479-6262 Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: nschroeder@blainc.com Hours_of_Service: 8am-5pm CST Data_Set_Credit: Indiana Statewide GIS database was produced under an Indiana Department of Transportation contract. Data is derived from the USGS subwatersheds digital coverage. US Geological Survey requests - "Acknowledgment of U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Indiana Department of Natural Resources- Division of Water would be appreciated in products derived from these data." Native_Data_Set_Environment: ArcView version 3.2 shapefile format Data_Quality_Information: Attribute_Accuracy: Attribute_Accuracy_Report: Hydrologic unit codes were added by the USGS and NRCS personnel. Attributes were rechecked using 1:24000 checkplots. Attribute processes are fully described in the source information. Logical_Consistency_Report: No overlaps or slivers encountered. Some multi-part polygons may exist because clipping to the state boundary can sometimes created seperate pieces of the same watershed. Completeness_Report: USGS metadata reports "This shapefile shows only the areas within the state of Indiana. Actual hydrologic units often extend beyond the state and county boundaries. All area attributes reflect only the portion of the hydrologic unit that lies within Indiana." Positional_Accuracy: Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy: Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report: USGS metadata reports - "All digitized lines fall within 0.025 inches of the source linework. The source linework had an average thickness of approximately 0.025 inches. The combined variation of about 0.05 inches at 1:24,000 scale constitutes a potential deviation of about 100 feet on the ground. The user is reminded that the source drainage-basin divides were interpreted from the topography represented on each 1:24,000 scale map." Vertical_Positional_Accuracy: Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Report: Vertical accuracy was not a factor in the digital production of the data set. Lineage: Source_Information: Source_Citation: Citation_Information: Originator: United States Geological Survey Publication_Date: Unknown Title: hand-drawn drainage divides for streams with drainage areas greater than 5 square miles Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Map Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000 Type_of_Source_Media: hardcopy Source_Time_Period_of_Content: Time_Period_Information: Range_of_Dates/Times: Beginning_Date: 1946 Ending_Date: 1991 Source_Currentness_Reference: Publication date of USGS 7.5' topo maps used to create a hand-drawn source linework of drainage-basin boundaries Source_Citation_Abbreviation: drainage Source_Contribution: These hand-drawn drainage-basin divides provided the basis for the 14-digit HU's in this ESRI ARCINFO coverage. Source_Information: Source_Citation: Citation_Information: Originator: Krysten M. Debroka and David A. Cohen, US Geological Survey, Robert E. Dunn and Bruce J. Nielson, Natural Resources Conservation Service Publication_Date: 19990801 Title: Digital dataset of 14-digit hydrologic units in Indiana Edition: Version 1.0.0, July 1999 Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Map Publication_Information: Publication_Place: Indianapolis, Indiana Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey Other_Citation_Details: Contact - District Chief, Indiana District, USGS-WRD, 5957 Lakeside Blvd, Indianapolis, Indiana 46278, 317-290-3333, dc_in@usgs.gov Online_Linkage: http://in.water.usgs.gov/ Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000 Type_of_Source_Media: hardcopy Source_Time_Period_of_Content: Time_Period_Information: Range_of_Dates/Times: Beginning_Date: 1946 Ending_Date: 1991 Source_Currentness_Reference: Publication date of USGS 7.5' topo maps used to create a hand-drawn source linework of drainage-basin boundaries Source_Citation_Abbreviation: IN14_HUC Source_Contribution: Digital file of Indiana subwatersheds (14 digit HUC) Process_Step: Process_Description: A TIC coverage was generated for the State of Indiana and immediate vicinity with a coordinate TIC at every 7.5 minutes of latitude and longitude. These TICS corresponded to the corner vertices of the 7.5-minute topographic maps that included any area in Indiana. The drainage divides on most of the maps (693 of 710) were digitized by hand on an ALTEK model AC-40 digitizing tablet. The drainage divides on the remaining 17 maps were scanned on a Scangraphics model CF1000 scanner. Following are the procedures used to hand digitize the drainage divides on 693 maps: Each map was taped to the digitizing tablet. The ARCEDIT module of ARC/INFO was used to determine the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of the 4 map corners as compared to the 4 corresponding TICs in the TIC coverage. All RMSE values for hand-digitized maps were 0.016 (the equivalent of 32 feet on the ground) or less. The RMSE values, along with other quality-assurance data, are recorded in the arc attribute table, in_hu14.aat. The drainage divides on the map were digitized in stream mode with a vertex every 0.020 inches (the equivalent of 40 feet on the ground). The following ARCEDIT tolerances were set- INTERSECTARCS ALL NODESNAP CLOSEST,32 ARCSNAP ON,32 SNAPPING CLOSEST,64 GRAIN 21.15783271851 WEEDTOLERANCE 16 The drainage divides on the following 17 topographic maps were scanned- Bluffton, Gilman, Quincy, Cloverdale, Hazelrigg, Roll, Deerfield, Montpelier, Saline City, Domestic, Newport, Shannondale, Frankton, Omega, Wallace, Gaston and Petroleum Following are the procedures used to scan the drainage divides on these 17 maps- Each map was scanned at 200 dots per inch (true optics out). The Scangraphics Editor was used to remove extraneous lines from the resulting raster-image file. The ESRI ARCINFO module ARCSCAN was used to vectorize the raster-image file. All RMSE values for scanned maps were 0.013 (the equivalent of 26 feet on the ground) or less. The following Arc Environment Properties were used in ARCSCAN during vectorization- Copy parallel- default Move parallel- default Rotate angle- default Align distance- default Vertex distance- 0.556 Node snap tol- Off Arc snap tol- Off Intersect arcs- Off Unsplit Item- Off The following Tracing Environment Settings were used in ARCSCAN during vectorization- Straighten Properties- Generalization- Tolerance- 0.01 Line Straightening Distance- 10.000 Range- 30.000 Angle- 15 Corner- 30 Line Properties- Width- 16.000 Value- 1 Gap- 15.000 Dash- 20.000 Hole- 0.05 Fan angle- 45 2nd angle- 90 Variance- 200 The following general procedures were performed subsequent to digitizing or scanning in 6-10 maps- After approximately 6-10 maps were digitized, the coverage was stripped of line overshoots and undershoots using the CLEAN command with DANGLE=50 and FUZZY_TOLERANCE=1. The newly digitized lines were then examined along the edges of the map where they should meet previously digitized lines from an adjoining map. Occasionally the ends of lines on adjoining maps did not join correctly. The lines on the original maps were examined, and in most cases, the drainage divides on the original paper maps did not precisely align across map edges. These lines were corrected on the original maps and the appropriate portion of the line was re-digitized. All digitized lines were examined for node dangles, double lines, and sliver polygons. These errors were corrected and a checkplot of each digitized map was plotted at 1:24,000 scale with a line thickness of 0.025 inches. Checkplots were placed over the original maps on a light table, and any portion of the digitized linework that did not overlie the original line was re-digitized. For quality control, 36% of the digitized maps (256 maps) were later re-plotted and all lines were checked by either a USGS staff member (other than the individual who originally digitized the map) or an NRCS staff member. Dates for this quality-assurance activity are recorded in the arc attribute table in_hu14.aat. Digitizing efficiency began to decrease after approximately 35-40 maps were digitized into the coverage. Undue amounts of time were being spent waiting for the image of digitized lines to be displayed on the computer screen. At this point, a second temporary TIC coverage was generated in the same manner as the original TIC coverage. Additional maps were then digitized into this temporary TIC coverage. Periodically, the temporary coverage was joined with the original coverage using the UNION command. All lines were then deleted from the temporary coverage. This process was repeated until all requisite maps were digitized. Each polygon in the coverage represented a distinct drainage basin and was attributed with 1) a code indicating whether the polygon represented a contributing or non-contributing area, and 2) a number based on the discharge point for the basin. These discharge-point numbers were based on the first column of data in Table 3 in Hoggatt (1975). An electronic file of the discharge-point numbers was sent to NRCS staff. NRCS staff used copies of the 1:24,000 scale maps with delineated drainage basins to determine 14-digit HUs according to their guidelines in NRCS National Instruction No. 170-304 (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1992, Mapping and digitizing watershed and subwatershed hydrologic-unit boundaries: National Instruction no. 170-304, 26 p., accessed May 30, 1997 at URL http://www.nhq.nrcs.usda.gov/hu/ni70304. html). NRCS staff then updated the electronic file of discharge-point numbers with the appropriate 14-digit HUC's and returned the file to USGS staff. The USGS staff converted the file to an INFO table and placed the 14-digit HUC into the item called HUC14_C. The RELATE function in ESRI ARCINFO was used, with the discharge-point number as the relate item, to attribute each polygon with the 14-digit HUC in an item called HUC_14. This procedure rendered several contiguous polygons with identical 14-digit HUC's (HUC_14). Lines dividing contiguous polygons with identical 14-digit HUC's were deleted using the DISSOLVE command to produce the final polygons in the subject data set. The STATISTICS function in ARC was used to calculate the total non- contributing area for each 14-digit HUC. The RELATE function in INFO was then used to attribute each polygon in the final data set with the total non-contributing area, calculated in acres. Manual adjustments were made where individual 14-digit HU's were represented by two or more non-contiguous polygons. To ensure that each 14-digit HU had the correct boundaries and the correct 14-digit HUC, checkplots of each map were plotted at 1:24,000 scale with each HU labeled with its HUC. These checkplots were then sent to NRCS. Any errors were noted and corrected, and new checkplots were generated and re-checked until every map was correct. Quality-assurance data for this activity is included in the arc-attribute table (AAT) of the final data set. HU names, provided by the NRCS, were added to the polygon-attribute table (PAT) of in_hu14. These names are based on the primary waterway within each HU. The arcs were assigned a 2-digit attribute, called HU_DIV, indicating the boundary type represented: 6 = Accounting Unit, 8 = Cataloging Unit, 11 = Watershed, 14 = Subwatershed, or the Indiana state line. Note that arcs representing the state line have a hu_div = 0 and all other arc attributes are blank or 0. Three colleague reviews of the final data set of 14-digit hydrologic units, the metadata and the Fact Sheet were performed in July 1999, two reviews by USGS staff and one review by a staff member of one of the cooperating agencies, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: drainage Process_Date: 19960201 - 19990801 Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: IN14_HUC Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Person_Primary: Contact_Person: Krysten M. Debroka and David A. Cohen; Robert E. Dunn and Bruce J. Nielson Contact_Organization: US Geological Survey; Natural Resource Conservatin Service Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: Indiana District, USGS-WRD Address: 5957 Lakeside Blvd City: Indianapolis State_or_Province: Indiana Postal_Code: 46278 Contact_Voice_Telephone: 317-290-3333 Process_Step: Process_Description: The source file "DIGITAL DATASET OF 14-DIGIT HYDROLOGIC UNITS IN INDIANA downloaded from the website and converted from ARCINFO coverage to Shapefile. A dissolve operation was performed on the HUC_11 field using geoprocessing which merged all subwatersheds into the larger watershed polygon. Area and perimeter fields were recalculated by software, but the hu_area and non-contrib fields were attributed by adding the values of those fields from the 14HU data. The number subwatersheds merged into each watershed is indicated in the "count" field. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: IN_HUC14 Process_Date: 20020800 Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: WATERSHEDS_HUC11_USGS_IN Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Person_Primary: Contact_Organization: Bernardin, Lochmueller and Assoicates Contact_Person: Cinda Bonds Contact_Position: Environmental Biologist Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 6200 Vogel Road City: Evansville State_or_Province: IN Postal_Code: 47715-4006 Country: USA Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800-423-7411 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 812-479-6262 Hours_of_Service: 8am-5pm CST Process_Step: Process_Description: Using ESRI ArcToolbox v. 8.3, the shapefile was changed from UTM Zone 16 NAD27 to UTM Zone 16 NAD83. Process_Date: 20040428 Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Person_Primary: Contact_Organization: Indiana Geological Survey Contact_Person: Chris Dintaman Contact_Position: Geologist, GIS Specialist Contact_Address: Address_Type: Mailing and physical address Address: 611 North Walnut Grove City: Bloomington State_or_Province: Indiana Postal_Code: 47405-2208 Country: USA Contact_Voice_Telephone: 812-856-5654 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 812-855-2862 Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: cdintama@indiana.edu Hours_of_Service: 0800 to 1700 Eastern Standard Time Contact_Instructions: Monday through Friday, except holidays Spatial_Data_Organization_Information: Indirect_Spatial_Reference: Indiana Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Vector Point_and_Vector_Object_Information: SDTS_Terms_Description: SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: GT-polygon composed of chains Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 359 Spatial_Reference_Information: Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition: Planar: Grid_Coordinate_System: Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator Universal_Transverse_Mercator: UTM_Zone_Number: 16 Transverse_Mercator: Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999600 Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -87.000000 Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.000000 False_Easting: 500000.000000 False_Northing: 0.000000 Planar_Coordinate_Information: Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: Coordinate pair Coordinate_Representation: Abscissa_Resolution: Ordinate_Resolution: Planar_Distance_Units: Meters Geodetic_Model: Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983 Ellipsoid_Name: GRS 80 Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.0000000 Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.26 Entity_and_Attribute_Information: Detailed_Description: Entity_Type: Entity_Type_Label: WATERSHEDS_HUC11_USGS_IN.dbf Entity_Type_Definition: Shapefile Attribute Table Entity_Type_Definition_Source: None Attribute: Attribute_Label: Count Attribute_Definition: number of subwatersheds dissolved to into the watershed polygon Attribute_Definition_Source: Software generated Attribute_Domain_Values: Unrepresentable_Domain: Software computed Attribute: Attribute_Label: Area Attribute_Definition: Area of polygon in map units (Sq meters) Attribute_Definition_Source: Software generated Attribute_Domain_Values: Range_Domain: Range_Domain_Minimum: 25992.3273 Range_Domain_Maximum: 808464983.1093 Attribute: Attribute_Label: Perimeter Attribute_Definition: Perimeter of polygon in map units (meters) Attribute_Definition_Source: Software generated Attribute_Domain_Values: Range_Domain: Range_Domain_Minimum: 971.0272 Range_Domain_Maximum: 214097.0580 Attribute: Attribute_Label: Huc_8 Attribute_Definition: 8-digit Hydrologic Units Attribute_Definition_Source: USGS Attribute_Domain_Values: Unrepresentable_Domain: Character Field Attribute: Attribute_Label: Huc_11 Attribute_Definition: 11-digit Hydrologic Units; unique identification Attribute_Definition_Source: USGS and USDA-NRCS Attribute_Domain_Values: Unrepresentable_Domain: Character Field Attribute: Attribute_Label: Hu_acres Attribute_Definition: Calculated as AREA * 0.0002471053; compiled by adding values of the subwatersheds which were dissolved Attribute_Definition_Source: USGS and USDA-NRCS Attribute_Domain_Values: Range_Domain: Range_Domain_Minimum: 6.4000 Range_Domain_Maximum: 199776.1000 Attribute: Attribute_Label: Noncontrib Attribute_Definition: Area of non-contributing portion of 14-digit HU, in acres; compiled by adding values of the subwatersheds which were dissolved Attribute_Definition_Source: USGS and USDA-NRCS Attribute_Domain_Values: Range_Domain: Range_Domain_Minimum: 0 Range_Domain_Maximum: 53392.0000 Distribution_Information: Distributor: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates Contact_Position: Environmental Division Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 6200 Vogel Road City: Evansville State_or_Province: IN Postal_Code: 47715-4006 Country: USA Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800-423-7411 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 812-479-6262 Contact_Website: www.blainc.com Hours_of_Service: 8am-5pm CST Resource_Description: Downloadable Data Distribution_Liability: No claims to accuracy are made on this data. It is intended to be used only for general planning purposes. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY The product is provided "AS IS", without any other warranties or conditions, expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, warranties for product quality, or suitability to a particular purpose or use. The risk or liability resulting from the use of this product is assumed by the user. Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates shares no liability with product users indirect, incidental, special, or consequential damages whatsoever, including, but not limited to, loss of revenue or profit, lost or damaged data or other commercial or economic loss. Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates is not responsible for claims by a third party. The maximum aggregate liability to the original purchaser shall not exceed the amount paid by you for the product. Metadata_Reference_Information: Metadata_Date: 20021109 Metadata_Review_Date: 20040428 Metadata_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates Contact_Person: Cinda Bonds Contact_Position: Environmental Biologist Contact_Address: Address_Type: Mailing and physical address Address: 6200 Vogel Road City: Evansville State_or_Province: IN Postal_Code: 47715-4006 Country: USA Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800-423-7411 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 812-479-6262 Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: cbonds@blainc.com Hours_of_Service: 8am-5pm CST Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC CSDGM Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998 Metadata_Access_Constraints: None Metadata_Use_Constraints: This metadata file is intended to accompany the data set identified and received from the BLA/IGS. It should not to be altered or summarized. BLA/IGS does not support secondary distribution. If this data set was received from anyone besides the BLA/IGS, this metadata file and the data set it describes may lack integrity.