Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: (creation): US Geological Survey
Originator: (compilation): Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates
Publication_Date: 20021100
Title:
WATERSHEDS_HUC11__USGS_IN: Watersheds, 11-digit
Hydrologic Units, in Indiana, (Derived from US Geological Survey,
Polygon Shapefile)
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Evansville, IN
Publisher: Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates
Other_Citation_Details:
This dataset is derived from
the Digital Dataset of 14-digit hydrologic units in Indiana
created by the US Geological Survey and Natural Resources
Conservation Service;
Dataset is one layer in the Indiana Statewide GIS Database
funded by Indiana Department of Transportation.
Online_Linkage: http://igs.indiana.edu/arcims/statewide/download.html
Description:
Abstract:
WATERSHEDS_HUC11_USGS_IN is a polygon shapefile showing the
boundaries of watersheds in Southwestern Indiana.
Watersheds are noted by a 11-digit hydrologic unit. Actual
hydrologic units often extend beyond the state and county
boundaries.
Purpose:
Provide a large-scale digital database of 11-digit HU (watershed) boundaries
for BROAD, GENERAL information for planning, development, and research
in Indiana.
Supplemental_Information:
HUC11_WATERSHEDS_USGS_IN was created by dissolving
the Digital Dataset of 14-digit hydrologic units in Indiana
created by the US Geological Survey and Natural Resources
Conservation Service;
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1946
Ending_Date: 1991
Currentness_Reference: Publication date of source lineage
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -88.1607
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -84.6882
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 41.7753
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 37.7554
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: Geography Network Keyword Thesaurus
Theme_Keyword: inlandWaters
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: Hydrologic Unit
Theme_Keyword: Hydrologic Unit Boundary
Theme_Keyword: Hydrologic Unit Code
Theme_Keyword: HUC
Theme_Keyword: HU
Theme_Keyword: HUA
Theme_Keyword: 11-digit hydrologic unit
Theme_Keyword: watershed
Theme_Keyword: hydrology
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Place_Keyword: Indiana
Place_Keyword: Adams County
Place_Keyword: Allen County
Place_Keyword: Bartholomew County
Place_Keyword: Benton County
Place_Keyword: Blackford County
Place_Keyword: Boone County
Place_Keyword: Brown County
Place_Keyword: Carroll County
Place_Keyword: Cass County
Place_Keyword: Clark County
Place_Keyword: Clay County
Place_Keyword: Clinton County
Place_Keyword: Crawford County
Place_Keyword: Daviess County
Place_Keyword: Dearborn County
Place_Keyword: Decatur County
Place_Keyword: DeKalb County
Place_Keyword: Delaware County
Place_Keyword: Dubois County
Place_Keyword: Elkhart County
Place_Keyword: Fayette County
Place_Keyword: Floyd County
Place_Keyword: Fountain County
Place_Keyword: Franklin County
Place_Keyword: Fulton County
Place_Keyword: Gibson County
Place_Keyword: Grant County
Place_Keyword: Greene County
Place_Keyword: Hamilton County
Place_Keyword: Hancock County
Place_Keyword: Harrison County
Place_Keyword: Hendricks County
Place_Keyword: Henry County
Place_Keyword: Howard County
Place_Keyword: Huntington County
Place_Keyword: Jackson County
Place_Keyword: Jasper County
Place_Keyword: Jay County
Place_Keyword: Jefferson County
Place_Keyword: Jennings County
Place_Keyword: Johnson County
Place_Keyword: Knox County
Place_Keyword: Kosciusko County
Place_Keyword: Lagrange County
Place_Keyword: Lake County
Place_Keyword: LaPorte County
Place_Keyword: Lawrence County
Place_Keyword: Madison County
Place_Keyword: Marion County
Place_Keyword: Marshall County
Place_Keyword: Martin County
Place_Keyword: Miami County
Place_Keyword: Monroe County
Place_Keyword: Montgomery County
Place_Keyword: Morgan County
Place_Keyword: Newton County
Place_Keyword: Noble County
Place_Keyword: Ohio County
Place_Keyword: Orange County
Place_Keyword: Owen County
Place_Keyword: Parke County
Place_Keyword: Perry County
Place_Keyword: Pike County
Place_Keyword: Porter County
Place_Keyword: Posey County
Place_Keyword: Pulaski County
Place_Keyword: Putnam County
Place_Keyword: Randolph County
Place_Keyword: Ripley County
Place_Keyword: Rush County
Place_Keyword: Scott County
Place_Keyword: Shelby County
Place_Keyword: Spencer County
Place_Keyword: Starke County
Place_Keyword: Steuben County
Place_Keyword: St Joseph County
Place_Keyword: Sullivan County
Place_Keyword: Switzerland County
Place_Keyword: Tippecanoe County
Place_Keyword: Tipton County
Place_Keyword: Union County
Place_Keyword: Vanderburgh County
Place_Keyword: Vermillion County
Place_Keyword: Vigo County
Place_Keyword: Wabash County
Place_Keyword: Warren County
Place_Keyword: Warrick County
Place_Keyword: Washington County
Place_Keyword: Wayne County
Place_Keyword: Wells County
Place_Keyword: White County
Place_Keyword: Whitley County
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
USGS metadata states - The arcs that define each HU were digitized from
hand-drawn drainage divides on 1:24,000-scale 7.5 minute topographic maps.
Use of this geodataset at any scale larger than 1:24,000 is discouraged.
DATA DISCLAIMER
This data set was compiled by Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates,
using data believed to be accurate; however, a degree of error
is inherent in all data. This product is distributed "AS-IS" without
warranties of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not
limited to warranties of suitability of a particular purpose or use. No
attempt has been made in either the designed format or production of these data to
define the limits or jurisdiction of any federal, state, or local government.
These data are intended for use only at the published scale or smaller and are for
reference purposes only. They are not to be construed as a legal document or survey
instrument. A detailed on-the-ground survey and historical analysis of a single
site may differ from this data.
CREDIT
USGS metadata requests -
"Acknowledgment of U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation
Service, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Indiana Department of
Natural Resources-Division of Water would be appreciated in products derived
from these data."
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates
Contact_Person: Neal Schroeder
Contact_Position: Geographer, Environmental Planner
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 6200 Vogel Road
City: Evansville
State_or_Province: IN
Postal_Code: 47715-4006
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800-423-7411
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 812-479-6262
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: nschroeder@blainc.com
Hours_of_Service: 8am-5pm CST
Data_Set_Credit:
Indiana Statewide GIS database was produced under an Indiana Department of
Transportation contract. Data is derived from the USGS subwatersheds digital
coverage. US Geological Survey requests -
"Acknowledgment of U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Indiana Department
of Environmental Management, Indiana Department of Natural Resources-
Division of Water would be appreciated in products derived from these
data."
Native_Data_Set_Environment: ArcView version 3.2 shapefile format
Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
Hydrologic unit codes were added by the USGS and
NRCS personnel. Attributes were rechecked using 1:24000
checkplots. Attribute processes are fully described in the source information.
Logical_Consistency_Report:
No overlaps or slivers encountered. Some multi-part
polygons may exist because clipping to the state boundary can
sometimes created seperate pieces of the same watershed.
Completeness_Report:
USGS metadata reports
"This shapefile shows only the areas within the state of
Indiana. Actual hydrologic units often
extend beyond the state and county boundaries. All area
attributes reflect only the portion of the hydrologic unit
that lies within Indiana."
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
USGS metadata reports -
"All digitized lines fall within 0.025 inches of the source
linework. The source linework had an average thickness of
approximately 0.025 inches. The combined variation of about
0.05 inches at 1:24,000 scale constitutes a potential deviation
of about 100 feet on the ground. The user is reminded that the
source drainage-basin divides were interpreted from the
topography represented on each 1:24,000 scale map."
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy:
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
Vertical accuracy was not a factor in the digital production
of the data set.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: United States Geological Survey
Publication_Date: Unknown
Title:
hand-drawn drainage divides for streams with drainage
areas greater than 5 square miles
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Map
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: hardcopy
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1946
Ending_Date: 1991
Source_Currentness_Reference:
Publication date of USGS 7.5' topo maps used to create a
hand-drawn source linework of drainage-basin boundaries
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: drainage
Source_Contribution:
These hand-drawn drainage-basin divides provided the basis for
the 14-digit HU's in this ESRI ARCINFO coverage.
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
Krysten M. Debroka and David A. Cohen, US Geological Survey, Robert E. Dunn and Bruce J. Nielson, Natural
Resources Conservation Service
Publication_Date: 19990801
Title: Digital dataset of 14-digit hydrologic units in Indiana
Edition: Version 1.0.0, July 1999
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Map
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Indianapolis, Indiana
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Other_Citation_Details:
Contact - District Chief, Indiana District, USGS-WRD,
5957 Lakeside Blvd, Indianapolis, Indiana 46278,
317-290-3333, dc_in@usgs.gov
Online_Linkage: http://in.water.usgs.gov/
Source_Scale_Denominator: 24000
Type_of_Source_Media: hardcopy
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1946
Ending_Date: 1991
Source_Currentness_Reference:
Publication date of USGS 7.5' topo maps used to create a
hand-drawn source linework of drainage-basin boundaries
Source_Citation_Abbreviation: IN14_HUC
Source_Contribution: Digital file of Indiana subwatersheds (14 digit HUC)
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
A TIC coverage was generated for the State of Indiana and immediate vicinity
with a coordinate TIC at every 7.5 minutes of latitude and longitude. These
TICS corresponded to the corner vertices of the 7.5-minute topographic maps
that included any area in Indiana. The drainage divides on most of the maps
(693 of 710) were digitized by hand on an ALTEK model AC-40 digitizing tablet.
The drainage divides on the remaining 17 maps were scanned on a Scangraphics
model CF1000 scanner.
Following are the procedures used to hand digitize the drainage divides on 693 maps:
Each map was taped to the digitizing tablet. The ARCEDIT module of ARC/INFO was used
to determine the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of the 4 map corners as compared to the
4 corresponding TICs in the TIC coverage. All RMSE values for hand-digitized maps were
0.016 (the equivalent of 32 feet on the ground) or less. The RMSE values, along with other quality-assurance data,
are recorded in the arc attribute table, in_hu14.aat. The drainage divides on the map were digitized in stream
mode with a vertex every 0.020 inches (the equivalent of 40 feet on the ground).
The following ARCEDIT tolerances were set-
INTERSECTARCS ALL NODESNAP CLOSEST,32 ARCSNAP ON,32 SNAPPING CLOSEST,64 GRAIN 21.15783271851
WEEDTOLERANCE 16
The drainage divides on the following 17 topographic maps were scanned-
Bluffton, Gilman, Quincy, Cloverdale, Hazelrigg, Roll, Deerfield, Montpelier, Saline
City, Domestic, Newport, Shannondale, Frankton, Omega, Wallace, Gaston and Petroleum
Following are the procedures used to scan the drainage divides on these 17 maps-
Each map was scanned at 200 dots per inch (true optics out). The Scangraphics Editor
was used to remove extraneous lines from the resulting raster-image file. The ESRI ARCINFO
module ARCSCAN was used to vectorize the raster-image file. All RMSE values for scanned
maps were 0.013 (the equivalent of 26 feet on the ground) or less.
The following Arc Environment Properties were used in ARCSCAN during vectorization-
Copy parallel- default Move parallel- default Rotate angle- default Align distance-
default Vertex distance- 0.556 Node snap tol- Off Arc snap tol- Off Intersect arcs-
Off Unsplit Item- Off
The following Tracing Environment Settings were used in ARCSCAN during vectorization-
Straighten Properties- Generalization- Tolerance- 0.01 Line Straightening Distance-
10.000 Range- 30.000 Angle- 15 Corner- 30 Line Properties- Width- 16.000 Value- 1
Gap- 15.000 Dash- 20.000 Hole- 0.05 Fan angle- 45 2nd angle- 90 Variance- 200
The following general procedures were performed subsequent to digitizing or scanning
in 6-10 maps-
After approximately 6-10 maps were digitized, the coverage was stripped of line overshoots
and undershoots using the CLEAN command with DANGLE=50 and FUZZY_TOLERANCE=1. The newly
digitized lines were then examined along the edges of the map where they should meet
previously digitized lines from an adjoining map. Occasionally the ends of lines on
adjoining maps did not join correctly. The lines on the original maps were examined, and
in most cases, the drainage divides on the original paper maps did not precisely align
across map edges. These lines were corrected on the original maps and the appropriate
portion of the line was re-digitized.
All digitized lines were examined for node dangles, double lines, and sliver polygons.
These errors were corrected and a checkplot of each digitized map was plotted at
1:24,000 scale with a line thickness of 0.025 inches. Checkplots were placed over the
original maps on a light table, and any portion of the digitized linework that did not
overlie the original line was re-digitized. For quality control, 36% of the digitized maps
(256 maps) were later re-plotted and all lines were checked by either a USGS staff
member (other than the individual who originally digitized the map) or an NRCS staff
member. Dates for this quality-assurance activity are recorded in the arc attribute table
in_hu14.aat.
Digitizing efficiency began to decrease after approximately 35-40 maps were digitized
into the coverage. Undue amounts of time were being spent waiting for the image of
digitized lines to be displayed on the computer screen. At this point, a second temporary
TIC coverage was generated in the same manner as the original TIC coverage. Additional
maps were then digitized into this temporary TIC coverage. Periodically, the temporary
coverage was joined with the original coverage using the UNION command. All lines were
then deleted from the temporary coverage. This process was repeated until all requisite
maps were digitized.
Each polygon in the coverage represented a distinct drainage basin and was attributed
with 1) a code indicating whether the polygon represented a contributing or
non-contributing area, and 2) a number based on the discharge point for the basin. These
discharge-point numbers were based on the first column of data in Table 3 in Hoggatt
(1975). An electronic file of the discharge-point numbers was sent to NRCS staff. NRCS
staff used copies of the 1:24,000 scale maps with delineated drainage basins to determine
14-digit HUs according to their guidelines in NRCS National Instruction No. 170-304
(U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 1992, Mapping
and digitizing watershed and subwatershed hydrologic-unit boundaries: National Instruction
no. 170-304, 26 p., accessed May 30, 1997 at URL http://www.nhq.nrcs.usda.gov/hu/ni70304.
html). NRCS staff then updated the electronic file of discharge-point numbers with the
appropriate 14-digit HUC's and returned the file to USGS staff. The USGS staff converted
the file to an INFO table and placed the 14-digit HUC into the item called HUC14_C. The
RELATE function in ESRI ARCINFO was used, with the discharge-point number as the relate item,
to attribute each polygon with the 14-digit HUC in an item called HUC_14. This procedure
rendered several contiguous polygons with identical 14-digit HUC's (HUC_14). Lines
dividing contiguous polygons with identical 14-digit HUC's were deleted using the
DISSOLVE command to produce the final polygons in the subject data set.
The STATISTICS function in ARC was used to calculate the total non- contributing
area for each 14-digit HUC. The RELATE function in INFO was then used to attribute
each polygon in the final data set with the total non-contributing area, calculated
in acres. Manual adjustments were made where individual 14-digit HU's were represented
by two or more non-contiguous polygons.
To ensure that each 14-digit HU had the correct boundaries and the correct 14-digit HUC,
checkplots of each map were plotted at 1:24,000 scale with each HU labeled with its HUC.
These checkplots were then sent to NRCS. Any errors were noted and corrected, and new
checkplots were generated and re-checked until every map was correct. Quality-assurance
data for this activity is included in the arc-attribute table (AAT) of the final data set.
HU names, provided by the NRCS, were added to the polygon-attribute table (PAT) of in_hu14.
These names are based on the primary waterway within each HU.
The arcs were assigned a 2-digit attribute, called HU_DIV, indicating the boundary type
represented: 6 = Accounting Unit, 8 = Cataloging Unit, 11 = Watershed, 14 = Subwatershed,
or the Indiana state line. Note that arcs representing the state line have a hu_div = 0
and all other arc attributes are blank or 0.
Three colleague reviews of the final data set of 14-digit hydrologic units, the metadata
and the Fact Sheet were performed in July 1999, two reviews by USGS staff and one review
by a staff member of one of the cooperating agencies, the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: drainage
Process_Date: 19960201 - 19990801
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: IN14_HUC
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Krysten M. Debroka and David A. Cohen; Robert E. Dunn and Bruce J. Nielson
Contact_Organization: US Geological Survey; Natural Resource Conservatin Service
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: Indiana District, USGS-WRD
Address: 5957 Lakeside Blvd
City: Indianapolis
State_or_Province: Indiana
Postal_Code: 46278
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 317-290-3333
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
The source file "DIGITAL DATASET OF 14-DIGIT HYDROLOGIC
UNITS IN INDIANA downloaded from the website and converted
from ARCINFO coverage to Shapefile. A dissolve operation was
performed on the HUC_11 field using geoprocessing which merged
all subwatersheds into the larger watershed polygon. Area and
perimeter fields were recalculated by software, but the hu_area
and non-contrib fields were attributed by adding the values of
those fields from the 14HU data. The number subwatersheds merged
into each watershed is indicated in the "count" field.
Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: IN_HUC14
Process_Date: 20020800
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: WATERSHEDS_HUC11_USGS_IN
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Bernardin, Lochmueller and Assoicates
Contact_Person: Cinda Bonds
Contact_Position: Environmental Biologist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 6200 Vogel Road
City: Evansville
State_or_Province: IN
Postal_Code: 47715-4006
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800-423-7411
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 812-479-6262
Hours_of_Service: 8am-5pm CST
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Using ESRI ArcToolbox v. 8.3, the shapefile was changed from UTM Zone 16 NAD27 to UTM Zone 16 NAD83.
Process_Date: 20040428
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Indiana Geological Survey
Contact_Person: Chris Dintaman
Contact_Position: Geologist, GIS Specialist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: Mailing and physical address
Address: 611 North Walnut Grove
City: Bloomington
State_or_Province: Indiana
Postal_Code: 47405-2208
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 812-856-5654
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 812-855-2862
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: cdintama@indiana.edu
Hours_of_Service: 0800 to 1700 Eastern Standard Time
Contact_Instructions: Monday through Friday, except holidays
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Indirect_Spatial_Reference: Indiana
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Vector
Point_and_Vector_Object_Information:
SDTS_Terms_Description:
SDTS_Point_and_Vector_Object_Type: GT-polygon composed of chains
Point_and_Vector_Object_Count: 359
Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Grid_Coordinate_System:
Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
UTM_Zone_Number: 16
Transverse_Mercator:
Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.999600
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -87.000000
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.000000
False_Easting: 500000.000000
False_Northing: 0.000000
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: Coordinate pair
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution:
Ordinate_Resolution:
Planar_Distance_Units: Meters
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid_Name: GRS 80
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.0000000
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.26
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: WATERSHEDS_HUC11_USGS_IN.dbf
Entity_Type_Definition: Shapefile Attribute Table
Entity_Type_Definition_Source: None
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Count
Attribute_Definition:
number of subwatersheds dissolved to
into the watershed polygon
Attribute_Definition_Source: Software generated
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Software computed
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Area
Attribute_Definition: Area of polygon in map units (Sq meters)
Attribute_Definition_Source: Software generated
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 25992.3273
Range_Domain_Maximum: 808464983.1093
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Perimeter
Attribute_Definition: Perimeter of polygon in map units (meters)
Attribute_Definition_Source: Software generated
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 971.0272
Range_Domain_Maximum: 214097.0580
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Huc_8
Attribute_Definition: 8-digit Hydrologic Units
Attribute_Definition_Source: USGS
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Character Field
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Huc_11
Attribute_Definition: 11-digit Hydrologic Units; unique identification
Attribute_Definition_Source: USGS and USDA-NRCS
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Character Field
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Hu_acres
Attribute_Definition:
Calculated as AREA * 0.0002471053; compiled
by adding values of the subwatersheds which were dissolved
Attribute_Definition_Source: USGS and USDA-NRCS
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 6.4000
Range_Domain_Maximum: 199776.1000
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Noncontrib
Attribute_Definition:
Area of non-contributing portion of 14-digit HU, in acres;
compiled by adding values of the subwatersheds which were dissolved
Attribute_Definition_Source: USGS and USDA-NRCS
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 0
Range_Domain_Maximum: 53392.0000
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates
Contact_Position: Environmental Division
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 6200 Vogel Road
City: Evansville
State_or_Province: IN
Postal_Code: 47715-4006
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800-423-7411
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone:
812-479-6262
Contact_Website: www.blainc.com
Hours_of_Service: 8am-5pm CST
Resource_Description: Downloadable Data
Distribution_Liability:
No claims to accuracy are made on this data. It is intended
to be used only for general planning purposes.
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY
The product is provided "AS IS",
without any other warranties or conditions, expressed or implied,
including, but not limited to, warranties for product quality, or
suitability to a particular purpose or use. The risk or liability
resulting from the use of this product is assumed by the user.
Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates shares no liability with product
users indirect, incidental, special, or consequential damages whatsoever,
including, but not limited to, loss of revenue or profit, lost or damaged
data or other commercial or economic loss. Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates
is not responsible for claims by a third party. The
maximum aggregate liability to the original purchaser shall not exceed
the amount paid by you for the product.
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20021109
Metadata_Review_Date: 20040428
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: Bernardin, Lochmueller and Associates
Contact_Person: Cinda Bonds
Contact_Position: Environmental Biologist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: Mailing and physical address
Address: 6200 Vogel Road
City: Evansville
State_or_Province: IN
Postal_Code: 47715-4006
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 800-423-7411
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 812-479-6262
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: cbonds@blainc.com
Hours_of_Service: 8am-5pm CST
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC CSDGM
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata_Access_Constraints: None
Metadata_Use_Constraints:
This metadata file is intended to accompany the
data set identified and received from the BLA/IGS. It should not to be altered
or summarized. BLA/IGS does not support secondary distribution. If this
data set was received from anyone besides the BLA/IGS, this metadata file and
the data set it describes may lack integrity.